Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183906›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2025

Evaluation of acaricidal effect of terpinolene and γ-terpinene on

Caishan Li, Licui Wen, Wenyu Shi, Yuqian Deng, Na Zhou, Xueqing Zhao, Ercha Hu, Bayinchahan Gailike

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caishan LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang 830052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4202-7289
Licui WenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang 830052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9147-4651
Wenyu ShiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang 830052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7422-6316
Yuqian DengCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang 830052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9058-9304
Na ZhouCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang 830052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4508-7531
Xueqing ZhaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang 830052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0786-3900
Ercha HuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang 830052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2628-1174
Bayinchahan GailikeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Xinjiang 830052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5355-8122

Funding

Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2021E01001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceTerpenoids of a plant origin are a class of alternatives to chemical acaricides for tick control. Despite this, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of terpenoid-containing herbal extracts or individual terpenoids in

objectiveThis study evaluated the killing efficacy of terpinolene and γ-terpinene against

methodsTerpinolene and γ-terpinene were subjected to adult tick immersion experiments to evaluate their killing effect on

resultsThe acaricidal effect of terpinolene and γ-terpinene against CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Terpinolene and γ-terpinolene have good killing effects against

Indexed as

AcaricidesIxodidaeMonoterpenesPlant ExtractsAnimalsComputer SimulationCyclohexane MonoterpenesDose-Response Relationship, DrugAcaricidesCyclohexane Monoterpenesgamma-terpineneMonoterpenesPlant ExtractsterpinoleneherbsHyalomma anatolicumterpenesTick identification

Identifiers

PMID40183906
PMCPMC11972941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.