Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183903›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2025

Comparison of five preservation methods for fascia allograft.

Jiyoung Park, Mu-Young Kim, Hun-Young Yoon

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jiyoung ParkDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1463-7872
Mu-Young KimDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea. zypo@konkuk.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-6272
Hun-Young YoonDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-952X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceResearch on tissue preservation, including cortical bone, skin, nerves, and vessels in glycerol and cortical bone in honey, has shown positive results. On the other hand, relatively few studies have been performed on fascia preservation, and comparisons between different fascia preservation methods remain scarce.

objectiveThis

methodsThe control group underwent biomechanical testing immediately after decellularization, while the other five groups were stored in glycerol, honey, deep freezer, lyophilizer, and liquid nitrogen for 30 days. The ultimate load, elongation at failure, and stiffness for each group were determined from a load-elongation curve.

resultsA comparison of the ultimate load showed that the control group had the highest value, followed by the glycerol group. The glycerol group was the only group that did not show a significant difference from the control group, while all the other groups showed a significantly lower ultimate load. A comparison of elongation at failure revealed the glycerol group to have the highest value at failure among all groups and was significantly higher than the deep freeze, honey, and cryopreservation groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Glycerol can be used as an effective method for preserving fascia allografts because the resulting allografts show a similar ultimate load to the control group and the highest mean elongation at failure.

Indexed as

AllograftsTissue PreservationAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCryopreservationGlycerolHoneyGlycerolAllograftbiomechanicsdecellularizationfasciarabbits

Identifiers

PMID40183903
PMCPMC11972942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.