ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025
Evolution of Preclinical Models for Glioblastoma Modelling and Drug Screening.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating ex vivo platforms with AI to guide glioblastoma treatment.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Flash Assembloids: A Rapid Biofabrication of a Platform for Modeling Early Glioblastoma Invasion at the Glioblastoma-Brain Organoid Interfaces.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Challenges We Faced with Animal Models for Neurological Disorders.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Targeting Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Therapeutic Opportunities.Cancers · 2026Review
- Decoding Glioblastoma Complexity Through Extracellular Vesicles, Organ-on-Chip Models, and Deep Learning.Cells · 2026Review
- Article
- Modeling blood-brain barrier-glioblastoma interactions: implications for chemoresistance and therapeutic targeting.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Review
- Dual-Function Lipid-Based Nanovector Strategy for Glioblastoma Immunotherapy: STING Activation and M1 Microglia Polarization.Drug development research · 2026Review
- Review
- Overcoming Chemoresistance in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Strategies, and Functional Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Glial Cell Dynamics in Neuroinflammation: Mechanisms, Interactions, and Therapeutic Implications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Advancing glioblastoma research by establishing a whole brain slice model.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Local Nanomedicine and Nano-Enabled Biomaterials After Glioblastoma Resection.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Modeling gliomas with organoids: reconstructing the human neural microenvironment for translational neuro-oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- A human iPSC-based neural spheroid platform for modelling glioblastoma infiltration using high-content imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Thermo-Magnetic Induction of Pro-Inflammatory Microglia: A Lipid-Based Nanovector Strategy for Glioblastoma Immunotherapy.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Modeling Glioblastoma with Brain Organoids: New Frontiers in Oncology and Space Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Hydroxytyrosol and Brain Tumors: Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Potential.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIsocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma is an extremely aggressive and fatal primary brain tumour, characterised by extensive heterogeneity and diffuse infiltration of brain parenchyma. Despite multimodal treatment and diverse research efforts to develop novel therapies, there has been limited success in improving patient outcomes. Constructing physiologically relevant preclinical models is essential to optimising drug screening processes and identifying more effective treatments. RECENT
findingsTraditional in-vitro models have provided critical insights into glioblastoma pathophysiology; however, they are limited in their ability to recapitulate the complex tumour microenvironment and its interactions with surrounding cells. In-vivo models offer a more physiologically relevant context, but often do not fully represent human pathology, are expensive, and time-consuming. These limitations have contributed to the low translational success of therapies from trials to clinic. Organoid and glioblastoma-on-a-chip technology represent significant advances in glioblastoma modelling and enable the replication of key features of the human tumour microenvironment, including its structural, mechanical, and biochemical properties. Organoids provide a 3D system that captures cellular heterogeneity and tumour architecture, while microfluidic chips offer dynamic systems capable of mimicking vascularisation and nutrient exchange. Together, these technologies hold tremendous potential for high throughput drug screening and personalised, precision medicine. This review explores the evolution of preclinical models in glioblastoma modelling and drug screening, emphasising the transition from traditional systems to more advanced organoid and microfluidic platforms. Furthermore, it aims to evaluate the advantages and limitations of both traditional and next-generation models, investigating their combined potential to address current challenges by integrating complementary aspects of specific models and techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.