Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183896›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025

Evolution of Preclinical Models for Glioblastoma Modelling and Drug Screening.

Grace Thomas, Ruman Rahman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Grace ThomasBiodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Ruman RahmanBiodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. ruman.rahman@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-9983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIsocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma is an extremely aggressive and fatal primary brain tumour, characterised by extensive heterogeneity and diffuse infiltration of brain parenchyma. Despite multimodal treatment and diverse research efforts to develop novel therapies, there has been limited success in improving patient outcomes. Constructing physiologically relevant preclinical models is essential to optimising drug screening processes and identifying more effective treatments. RECENT

findingsTraditional in-vitro models have provided critical insights into glioblastoma pathophysiology; however, they are limited in their ability to recapitulate the complex tumour microenvironment and its interactions with surrounding cells. In-vivo models offer a more physiologically relevant context, but often do not fully represent human pathology, are expensive, and time-consuming. These limitations have contributed to the low translational success of therapies from trials to clinic. Organoid and glioblastoma-on-a-chip technology represent significant advances in glioblastoma modelling and enable the replication of key features of the human tumour microenvironment, including its structural, mechanical, and biochemical properties. Organoids provide a 3D system that captures cellular heterogeneity and tumour architecture, while microfluidic chips offer dynamic systems capable of mimicking vascularisation and nutrient exchange. Together, these technologies hold tremendous potential for high throughput drug screening and personalised, precision medicine. This review explores the evolution of preclinical models in glioblastoma modelling and drug screening, emphasising the transition from traditional systems to more advanced organoid and microfluidic platforms. Furthermore, it aims to evaluate the advantages and limitations of both traditional and next-generation models, investigating their combined potential to address current challenges by integrating complementary aspects of specific models and techniques.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaModels, BiologicalAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumansOrganoidsTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic AgentsGlioblastomaGlioblastoma-on-a-chipMicrofluidsOrganoidsPreclinical model

Identifiers

PMID40183896
PMCPMC12081544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.