ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Treatment summaries for head and neck cancer survivors: a pilot study to improving patient recall and survivorship care plans.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment summary (TS) remains underused in head and neck cancer (HNC). We determine if receiving a personalized TS following a definitive HNC treatment improves patient recall of treatment details.
methodA history questionnaire was administered to assess patient accuracy in reporting diagnosis and treatment-related details at baseline (pre-TS) and 1-month follow-up (post-TS). Statistical significance of accuracy changes was assessed using McNemar's chi squared test.
resultsOne hundred participants were enrolled between January and December 2022. Ninety-one completed all surveys. Significant improvement in correct responses was noted for questions regarding cancer diagnosis type (94.5% post-TS, 78.0% pre-TS, p = 0.002), cancer diagnosis date (75.8% post-TS, 40.7% pre-TS, p < 0.001), T-stage (82.4% post-TS, 28.6% pre-TS, p < 0.001), and lymph node status (91.2% post-TS, 63.7% pre-TS, p < 0.001).
conclusionTS may improve HNC survivors' recall about their diagnosis and treatment in the short term. Patients view TS as beneficial to their survivorship care plans. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: TS in survivorship care plans are understudied in HNC patients. This investigation will serve as a meaningful contribution to the literature, promote additional investigation, and encourage improvement of informative resources available to HNC survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.