ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Scatter and beam hardening effect corrections in pelvic region cone beam CT images using a convolutional neural network.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate CT-free correction of attenuation, scatter, and aperture effects using deep learning in dedicated cardiac pinhole SPECT.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Fast and accurate iterative reconstruction using a volume integral model with look-up tables for pinhole SPECT.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based attenuation and scatter correction in myocardial SPECT without using X-ray CT images.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to remove scattered photons and beam hardening effect in cone beam CT (CBCT) images and make an image available for treatment planning. To remove scattered photons and beam hardening effect, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was used, and trained with distorted projection data including scattered photons and beam hardening effect and supervised projection data calculated with monochromatic X-rays. The number of training projection data was 17,280 with data augmentation and that of test projection data was 540. The performance of the CNN was investigated in terms of the number of photons in the projection data used in the training of the network. Projection data of pelvic CBCT images (32 cases) were calculated with a Monte Carlo simulation with six different count levels ranging from 0.5 to 3 million counts/pixel. For the evaluation of corrected images, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and the sum of absolute difference (SAD) were used. The results of simulations showed that the CNN could effectively remove scattered photons and beam hardening effect, and the PSNR, the SSIM, and the SAD significantly improved. It was also found that the number of photons in the training projection data was important in correction accuracy. Furthermore, a CNN model trained with projection data with a sufficient number of photons could yield good performance even though a small number of photons were used in the input projection data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40183875What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.