Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183875›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

Scatter and beam hardening effect corrections in pelvic region cone beam CT images using a convolutional neural network.

Soya Yagi, Keisuke Usui, Koichi Ogawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Soya YagiDepartment of Applied Informatics, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, 3-7-2 Kajinocho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-0002, Japan.
Keisuke UsuiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, 1-5-3 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0034, Japan.
Koichi OgawaDepartment of Applied Informatics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, 3-7-2 Kajinocho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-0002, Japan. ogawa@hosei.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7137-9447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to remove scattered photons and beam hardening effect in cone beam CT (CBCT) images and make an image available for treatment planning. To remove scattered photons and beam hardening effect, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was used, and trained with distorted projection data including scattered photons and beam hardening effect and supervised projection data calculated with monochromatic X-rays. The number of training projection data was 17,280 with data augmentation and that of test projection data was 540. The performance of the CNN was investigated in terms of the number of photons in the projection data used in the training of the network. Projection data of pelvic CBCT images (32 cases) were calculated with a Monte Carlo simulation with six different count levels ranging from 0.5 to 3 million counts/pixel. For the evaluation of corrected images, the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and the sum of absolute difference (SAD) were used. The results of simulations showed that the CNN could effectively remove scattered photons and beam hardening effect, and the PSNR, the SSIM, and the SAD significantly improved. It was also found that the number of photons in the training projection data was important in correction accuracy. Furthermore, a CNN model trained with projection data with a sufficient number of photons could yield good performance even though a small number of photons were used in the input projection data.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyConvolutional Neural NetworksImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPelvisScattering, RadiationHumansMonte Carlo MethodPhotonsSignal-To-Noise RatioBeam hardening effectCone beam CTConvolutional neural networkMonte Carlo simulationScatter correction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.