ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Assessing detector stability and image quality of thermal cameras on smartphones for medical applications: a comparative study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Use of Infrared Thermography: Where Are We and Where Are We Going.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Assessing the Health and Functionality of the Microcirculation Using Thermal Imaging.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Calibration of Smartphone-Based Infrared Thermal Cameras: Improved Bias and Persistent Random Error.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Infrared Thermal Imaging as a Predictor of Lumbar Paravertebral Block Effectiveness in Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Foot Temperature Measurement in People With Diabetes: Validation of a Non-Contact Thermal Device.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInfrared thermography (IRT) has gained significant interest in medical applications for its potential in diagnosing various conditions. Smartphone-based IRT modules offer portability and affordability, leading to increased utilization in medical settings. However, differences in performance among these modules raise questions about their reliability for medical use. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study compared three smartphone-based IRT modules (SmartIRT-Hikmicro, FLIR One Pro, and Seek Thermal CompactPRO-which, according to their datasheets, exhibit comparable quality and parameters. Temperature stability, surface temperature of the body, and spatial uniformity of provided images were assessed using calibrated black body measurements and surface temperature monitoring.
resultsThe Hikmicro module exhibited the most stable temperature readings, while FLIR One Pro showed the highest temperature increase over time. Seek Thermal CompactPRO demonstrated relatively better spatial uniformity. However, discrepancies in image resolution were noted, with FLIR One and Seek modules modifying image sizes through post-processing algorithms.
conclusionWhile SmartIRT modules offer affordability and portability, their performance varies significantly. Temporal stability emerges as a critical factor, with the Hikmicro module demonstrating leadership in this aspect. Careful consideration and validation are necessary when selecting and utilizing SmartIRT modules for medical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.