ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Advances in oxygen-releasing matrices for regenerative engineering applications.
Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Functional Wound Dressings in Precision Surgery: Immunometabolic Reprogramming, Bioadaptive Biomaterials, and Intelligent Regenerative Interfaces.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in stem cell-derived beta-cell therapy: A new frontier in type 1 diabetes treatment.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the effects of hypoxia on tissue repair have received wider attention with the deepening of tissue engineering research. Various oxygen supply strategies have wider applications in the field of tissue repair. Currently, commonly used methods of oxygen supply for defective tissues include hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and oxygen-releasing materials. Between them, oxygen-releasing materials continuously and efficiently release oxygen from within the defective tissue. Compared with HBO, which may cause oxidative stress in healthy tissues, supplying oxygen via oxygen-releasing materials is safer because of their oxygen-releasing in situ and specific oxygen supply characteristics. However, there still exist some problems in the study of oxygen-releasing materials, such as cytotoxicity and the shortage of oxygen-releasing time. The current reviews on oxygen-releasing materials mostly elaborate on the principles of oxygen-releasing materials and lack a review of their preparation methods and applications. In this paper, different types of oxygen-releasing materials, such as hydrogels, microspheres, and layers, are reviewed concerning their applications, structures, current development status, and challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40183849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.