Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2025
Concurrent training effects on H reflex, V wave and contractile properties of the plantar flexors: insights into different resistance training types.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Peer-reviewed by human experts: AI failed in key steps to generate a scoping review on the neural mechanisms of cross-education.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study explored neuromuscular adaptations following 11 weeks of concurrent training (CT) compared to resistance-only (R) and endurance-only (E) in trained men.
methodsThirty participants were randomized into three groups (E, R, CT), training three times per week. Neuromuscular assessments involved plantar-flexion maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), rate of torque development (RTD), evoked potentials (H reflex and V wave) and contractile properties at baseline, mid-training (week 5), and post-training. Resistance training for R and CT groups involved two phases: weeks 1-5 (maximal strength development) and weeks 6-11 (explosive/reactive strength and muscle power development). Endurance training for the E and CT groups involved 30-min of running on the heavy-intensity domain.
resultsMVIC increased similarly in the R and CT groups. The R group significantly improved peak and sequential RTD, soleus electromyographic (EMG) activity, V wave and contractile properties. Conversely, the CT group exhibited an interference effect during the first phase with no improvements in RTD or neuromuscular parameters. During the second phase, the CT group exhibited significant enhancements in sequential RTD, soleus EMG activity, H- and V-wave amplitude. The improvements in the E group were limited to H-reflex excitability.
conclusionThese findings suggest that the magnitude of CT interference is modulated by the focus of resistance training (maximal vs explosive strength) being performed. However, it is relevant to note that contractile impairments seem to persist, likely due to endurance training in the heavy-intensity domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40183847What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.