ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Advanced cardiac imaging modalities in U.S. heart transplant centers: availability and distribution.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive imaging in heart transplant recipients: state of art and future direction.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Multimodal Cardiac Imaging of Immune-Mediated Complications Post Heart Transplantation: A Contemporary Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates the availability of advanced imaging modalities, including cardiac computed tomography (CCT), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), cardiac positron emission tomography (PET), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)/optical coherence tomography (OCT), at Medicare-approved heart transplant centers across the United States.
methodsWe retrieved the list of Medicare-approved heart transplant centers and data on physicians billing for cardiac imaging procedures from the CMS website. Addresses of billing physicians were matched with those of heart transplant centers to determine the availability of imaging modalities at each center. Additionally, we calculated the number of available imaging modalities and the median volume of studies per center. Further, we mapped heart transplant centers along with their available modalities.
resultsOf 129 Medicare-approved heart transplant centers, 90.7% offered CCT, 85.3% provided CMR, 74.4% had IVUS/OCT, and 55% offered cardiac PET. Only 39.5% of centers had all four modalities available. Geographic disparities were observed, with clustering of centers and modalities in the Northeast and West Coast and fewer centers in the Midwest.
conclusionThis study highlights disparities in the availability of advanced imaging modalities in heart transplant centers across the United States. While CCT and CMR are widely available, the availability of cardiac PET and IVUS/OCT remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40183824What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.