Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183810›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2025

Assessing CREMAs' Capacity to Govern Landscape Resources in the Western Wildlife Corridor of Northern Ghana.

Eric Rega Christophe Bayala, Mathurin Zida, Kwabena Owusu Asubonteng, Mirjam A F Ros-Tonen, James Reed, Freddie Sayi Siangulube, Amy Ickowitz, Houria Djoudi, Terry Sunderland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eric Rega Christophe BayalaCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Mathurin ZidaCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Kwabena Owusu AsubontengDepartment of Natural Resources and Geo-information Sciences, University for Development Studies (UDS), Tamale, Ghana.
Mirjam A F Ros-TonenAmsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.a.f.ros-tonen@uva.nl.
James ReedCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Freddie Sayi SiangulubeCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Amy IckowitzCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Houria DjoudiCenter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia.
Terry SunderlandFaculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) International Climate Initiative (IKI) grant 18_ IV_084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ghana initiated community resource management areas (CREMAs) as a community-based natural management approach to give local communities the right and power to manage natural resources within their territorial boundaries. The expectation is that communities and their environment would prosper through more equitable landscape governance and sustainable use of natural resources. However, the challenges to achieving full functionality of CREMA and expected results, particularly in the Western Wildlife Corridor in northern Ghana, raise questions about the governance actors' capacity. Therefore, this study aims to assess the capacity of actors to take ownership of and lead the governance processes implied by the CREMA approach. Based on focus group discussions and individual interviews, we found that the capacities of the CREMA governance bodies are weak to implement the CREMA approach effectively. The lack of knowledge and technical skills to support multi-actor processes, the weak collaboration between actors, and the lack of sustainable financial inflows and livelihood support are key challenges to be addressed for better CREMA performance. Despite these constraints, local actors' enthusiasm and willingness to engage more actively in the governance of their landscape constitute an opportunity for an improved implementation of the CREMA approach. We suggest that initiatives to strengthen the technical and financial capacities of governance bodies and raise awareness among the local population are necessary to improve the functioning and performance of CREMAs. In addition, actions to improve the livelihoods of local communities will enhance the mobilization and engagement of social groups in the implementation of the CREMA concept.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsAnimals, WildFocus GroupsGhanaHumansNatural ResourcesCapacityConservation and developmentCREMAGhanaLandscape governanceNatural resource management

Identifiers

PMID40183810
PMCPMC12033088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.