ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Biomarker-based approach to human exposure assessment of furan in food.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are continuously exposed to furan, a hepatotoxic and carcinogenic process-related food contaminant. Considerable uncertainties associated with current exposure estimates based on the content of furan in food underscore the need to explore biomarker monitoring as an alternative or complementary approach to furan exposure assessment. Previous work in rats demonstrated a linear correlation between furan dose and several urinary furan metabolites, whereby N-[4-carboxy-4-(3-mercapto-1H-pyrrol-1-yl)-1-oxobutyl]-L-cysteinylglycine (GSH-BDA), the glutathione (GSH) conjugate of the reactive furan metabolite cis-2-butene-1,4-dial (BDA), was identified as a specific biomarker of exogenous furan exposure. To further test the validity of GSH-BDA as a biomarker of furan exposure, the present study was designed to monitor urinary excretion of furan metabolites in human volunteers after consumption of diets with low vs. high furan content using stable isotope dilution LC-MS/MS, and to investigate if analysis of GSH-BDA in human urine is suitable for translating biomarker levels into probable daily intakes. Ten healthy volunteers (n = 5/sex) consumed a low-furan diet for three days (day 1-3), followed by consumption of foods with high furan content for three days (day 4-6) and returned to a low-furan diet for a further three days (7-9). Urinary GSH-BDA excretion significantly increased during periods of a high-furan diet, and rapidly declined upon returning to a low-furan diet. Probable daily intakes estimated from GSH-BDA excretion in non-smoking subjects and excretion rates previously determined in F344/DuCrl rats ranged from 0.05 to 0.31 µg/kg bw/d during periods of low-furan diet and increased to 0.18-1.20 µg/kg bw/d during consumption of a high-furan diet. These estimates are in good agreement with exposures reported by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which range between 0.11 to 0.75 µg/kg bw per day (minimum LB to maximum UB) for the average adult and 0.20 to 1.22 µg/kg bw per day (minimum LB to maximum UB) for highly exposed adult consumers (95th percentile). Interestingly, higher excretion of GSH-BDA was observed in smoking compared to non-smoking individuals, highlighting tobacco smoke as a significant source of furan exposure and confounding factor when estimating furan exposure via diet. In contrast to GSH-BDA, high urinary background levels of lysine adducts of BDA and BDA-derived cysteine-lysine crosslinks limit their suitability as biomarkers of exogenous furan exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.