Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183712›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2025

Addressing blinding in classic psychedelic studies with innovative active placebos.

Jacob S Aday, Otto Simonsson, Emmanuelle A D Schindler, Deepak Cyril D'Souza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ten practical suggestions for setting up a psychedelic study.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Psychedelic therapeutics in psychiatric conditions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacob S AdayDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0578-8530
Otto SimonssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4197-7566
Emmanuelle A D SchindlerDepartment of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Deepak Cyril D'SouzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

TRAINING OF ARTHRITIS RESEARCH SCIENTISTST32AR007080 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jason Knight · 1986 to 2026
$6.3M
Ceruvia LifesciencesClusterbusters, IncHeffter Research InstituteNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health T32AR007080-44S1NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007080Olle Engvist FoundationVA R&DVikram Sodhi Endowed Chair of PsychiatryWallace Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classic psychedelics have shown promise in the treatment of various neuropsychiatric disorders. However, weak blinding integrity has been argued to limit the interpretability of therapeutic effects observed in psychedelic clinical trials, highlighting the need to explore alternative active placebos. Here, we aimed to describe the drawbacks of current placebo conditions used in classic psychedelic studies, propose criteria for suitable active placebos, and review interventions that may putatively fit these criteria. Considerations for the characteristics of ideal active placebos in classic psychedelic studies include (1) acute psychoactive effects, (2) acute physiological effects, (3) onset and duration of acute effects, (4) safety, and (5) lack of therapeutic effects in the target disease. We identified several pharmacological agents that may have potential as active placebos in trials involving moderate-to-high doses of certain short-acting and long-acting classic psychedelics, as well as low-dose administration and microdosing regimes. To accurately assess the safety and efficacy of classic psychedelics as therapeutics, future research should apply a thoughtful process for selecting active placebos and consider ancillary strategies to improve blinding in trials involving these substances.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHallucinogensMental DisordersPlacebo EffectDouble-Blind MethodHumansPlacebosResearch DesignHallucinogensPlacebosactive placebosblindingcontrol conditionspsychedelicsreview

Identifiers

PMID40183712
PMCPMC12038243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.