ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Effect of cottonseed diet on the performance of meat artificially infected with Haemonchus contortus.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of gut microbiota features of diarrheic calves using the full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and machine learning.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Potential roles of colostrum microbiota in shaping calf gut microbiota and colostrum metabolites.JDS communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gossypol is a phenolic compound found in cottonseed. Phenolic compounds are plant secondary metabolites, known to have both, beneficial and negative effects on animals. The present experiment evaluated the beneficial and negative effects of cottonseed on growth, daily weight gain, and parasite infection measured by fecal egg counts, liver function, and ruminal microbiome of growing female meat goats. Forty Boer × Spanish doelings were assigned to 4 groups (n = 10 per group) in a 2 × 2 factorial design consisting of cottonseed supplementation (CS)-NP CS (0.5% body weight-BW in kg) + no parasite infection (NP) CON-NP commercial pellets or control (CON) + no parasite infection (NP); CON-P commercial pellets or control (CON) + Haemonchus contortus artificial infection (P); and CS-P CS supplementation (CS) + H. contortus artificial infection (P). Artificial infection consisted of 4,000 H. contortus infective larvae (L3). The FEC were not affected by diet. The liver function showed a diet by parasite interaction (P = 0.03) for the mean velocity of the hepatic portal vein, which was decreased in CON-P compared with CS-NP indicating a reduction in metabolism. A diet by parasite interaction (P = 0.014) was also observed for the diameter of the hepatic portal vein, which was increased in the CS-P goats compared to all other groups. Liver weights were affected by diet, being decreased in the CS animals vs the CON ones (P = 0.00), as well as the liver weight relative to the animal's BW (P = 0.01). Diet effect (P = 0.01) was observed for the liver blood flow relative to liver weight. For the rumen microbiome, the number of bacterial species was unaffected by CS but decreased by the parasite challenge (P = 0.03). In conclusion, the supplementation of female meat goats with CS did not affect BW, daily weight gain, parasite infection, and FAMACHA©, but reduced the liver weights, influenced fiber-digesting bacteria in the rumen, and restored lipolytic bacteria in the rumen of goats with parasite challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.