Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183513›Full record

ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians

Beyond fluorodeoxyglucose: Molecular imaging of cancer in precision medicine.

Malik E Juweid, Soud F Al-Qasem, Fadlo R Khuri, Andrea Gallamini, Philipp Lohmann, Hans-Joachim Ziellenbach, Felix M Mottaghy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnostic Efficacy of FAPI-PET/CT Versus [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Dual-receptor PET imaging of ovarian cancer using aAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Malik E JuweidDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6294-8118
Soud F Al-QasemDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6921-7748
Fadlo R KhuriDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8638-7618
Andrea GallaminiResearch and Innovation Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2054-7412
Philipp LohmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5360-046X
Hans-Joachim ZiellenbachDepartment of Health and Social Affairs, Hamburg Distance Learning University, Hamburg, Germany.
Felix M MottaghyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7212-6521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer molecular imaging is the noninvasive visualization of a process unique to or altered in neoplasia, such as proliferation, glucose metabolism, and receptor expression, which is relevant to patient management. Several molecular imaging modalities are now available, including magnetic resonance, optical, and nuclear imaging. Nuclear imaging, particularly using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, is widely used in the staging and response assessment of multiple cancer types. However, at this writing, new nuclear medicine probes, especially positron emission tomography tracers, are increasingly used or are being investigated for cancer evaluation. This review focuses on these probes, their biologic targets, and the applications or potential applications for their use in the assessment of various neoplasms, including both probes available for commercial use-such as somatostatin receptor ligands in neuroendocrine tumors, prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in prostate cancer, norepinephrine analogs in neural crest tumors like neuroblastoma, and estrogen analogs in breast cancer-and others in clinical development, such as fibroblast-activating protein inhibitors, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 ligands, and monoclonal antibodies targeting receptor tyrosine kinases, CD4-positive or CD8-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor-associated macrophages, and cancer stem cell biomarkers. These developments represent a major step toward the integration of molecular imaging as a powerful tool in precision medicine, with an expectedly significant impact on patient management and outcome.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Molecular ImagingNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineRadiopharmaceuticalsFemaleHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticalscancerestrogen receptormolecular imagingpositron‐emission tomography (PET)precision medicineprostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)somatostatin analogs

Identifiers

PMID40183513
PMCPMC12061632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.