Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183496›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025

Effects of haemorrhage and lactated Ringer's solution or tetrastarch 130/0.4 resuscitation on colloidal osmotic pressure and osmolality in cats.

Anthea Michaletos, Marinell Breytenbach, Gareth E Zeiler

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anthea MichaletosValley Farm Animal Hospital, Faerie Glen, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0008-8592-6772
Marinell BreytenbachValley Farm Animal Hospital, Faerie Glen, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0009-0006-4184-0876
Gareth E ZeilerValley Farm Animal Hospital, Faerie Glen, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7653-7726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine the effects of haemorrhage and fluid over-resuscitation on colloidal osmotic pressure of albumin (COP albumin), plasma (Posm) and effective (Eosm) osmolality in anaesthetised cats.MethodsA total of six cats were given three treatments once, at 2-month intervals, in a randomised, crossover haemorrhage-resuscitation study. The treatments were divided into two phases, a controlled haemorrhage phase and a fluid resuscitation phase, as follows: (1) NoHR = no controlled haemorrhage and no resuscitation; (2) LRS = controlled haemorrhage followed by lactated Ringer's solution infusion (60 ml/kg/h); and (3) TS = controlled haemorrhage followed by 6% tetrastarch 130/0.4 suspended in 0.9% saline infusion (20 ml/kg/h). The resuscitation fluids were administered for 120 mins. Data were collected before haemorrhage, before resuscitation and at 30 min intervals until 120 mins. Variables were calculated at each time point as follows: COP albumin = albumin concentration (g/l) × 0.57; Posm = (2 × sodium) + glucose + blood urea nitrogen; and Eosm = (2 × sodium) + glucose. All Posm and Eosm concentrations were measured as mmol/l. Data were compared using a general linear mixed model (significance:

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesFluid TherapyHemorrhageOsmotic PressureResuscitationRinger's LactateAnimalsCatsColloidsCross-Over StudiesFemaleMaleOsmolar ConcentrationColloidsRinger's LactateColloid oncotic pressureeffective osmolarityfluid overloadfluid resuscitationplasma osmolarity

Identifiers

PMID40183496
PMCPMC11970108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.