ReviewActa myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology2025
What did we learn from new treatments in SMA? A narrative review.
Review in Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and effectiveness of risdiplam in adults with spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- The evolving therapeutic landscape of spinal muscular atrophy - A scoping review of investigational agents, emerging delivery technologies and strategic innovations.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: interim analysis from LT-001, a long-term follow-up study of patients from the START study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- RNA biomarkers in spinal muscular atrophy: enhancing pathogenesis understanding and guiding precision medicine.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Real-world evidence on nusinersen treatment of persons with SMA: a focused review.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Neonatal Genetic Screening Results for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Romania: Insights from a 3-Years Pilot Program.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Ad astra per aspera: treatment challenges and opportunities for children with spinal muscular atrophy and tracheostomy.Gene therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder caused by SMN1 gene mutations, leading to inevitable motoneuronal degeneration. The introduction of disease modifying therapies has dramatically altered its natural history, shifting management from palliative to proactive approach. The new phenotypes and differences in treatment response and efficacy, are all contributing to reshape our understanding of the disease itself. This paper aims to analyze the lessons derived from the recent therapeutic advances, focusing on key aspects such as therapeutic windows, impact of early treatment and both disease progression and treatment efficacy modifiers. Ultimately, we also aim to give insights on new models of data analysis being explored to optimize patient trajectories and individualize treatment strategies. Our experience and the overall review of clinical trials and real-world data confirm that early treatment maximizes motor outcomes, especially when started in the pre-clinical phase of the disease. The significant clinical improvements in symptomatic type I infants treated at different ages has provided evidence of an expanded 'therapeutic window', previously reported as limited to the first few months after birth on the basis of neurophysiological findings. The available data also provide evidence that function at baseline, SMN2 copy number, and age at treatment all appear to represent critical determinants of response. The availability of long-term data is increasingly used to pilot new predictive models to support clinical decision-making and to adapt therapeutic goals based on patient-specific variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.