Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40183435›Full record

ReviewActa myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology2025

Deciphering Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in the clinical trials era: where are we now?

Francesca Torri, Beatrice Ciurli, Mariaconcetta Rende, Arianna Votta, Emanuele Mocciaro, Frida Karakashi, Matteo Lencioni, Elisabetta Ferraro, Massimiliano Filosto, Davide Gabellini and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesca TorriDepartment of New Technologies and Translational Research in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Beatrice CiurliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Mariaconcetta RendeDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Arianna VottaDepartment of Biology, Unit of cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Emanuele MocciaroDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Frida KarakashiDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Matteo LencioniUO Plastic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Elisabetta FerraroDepartment of Biology, Unit of cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Massimiliano FilostoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Davide GabelliniDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Gabriele SicilianoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giulia RicciDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a common genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness, especially in the face, shoulders, and upper limbs. Despite extensive research, the underlying pathogenesis and clinical variability remain incompletely understood. This review aims to summarize recent advances in FSHD research, focusing on genetic and epigenetic factors and the potential for precision medicine. Methods: A comprehensive review of recent literature was conducted, examining molecular mechanisms such as mutations in the D4Z4 region, DUX4 expression, RNA interference (RNAi) and antisense oligonucleotides (AOs). Clinical variability was analyzed to assess different disease phenotypes. Clinical trials investigating potential treatments, especially those targeting DUX4, were also reviewed. Results: FSHD shows significant clinical variability, with different progression rates across phenotypes. The 4qA allele is linked to more typical forms of the disease, but epigenetic factors, including DNA methylation and miRNA expression, also influence disease severity. Despite progress, the exact molecular mechanisms driving disease expression remain unclear. Clinical trials, such as Losmapimod, show promise in slowing muscle degeneration, though results remain inconsistent. Conclusions: FSHD presents significant challenges for therapy development due to its genetic complexity and clinical variability. Ongoing research is needed to clarify pathogenesis and identify reliable biomarkers. Future therapeutic strategies should focus on precision medicine, integrating genetic, clinical, and imaging data to optimize patient stratification and treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

Muscular Dystrophy, FacioscapulohumeralClinical Trials as TopicEpigenesis, GeneticHumansPhenotypeClinical trialsClinical variabilityDUX4Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD)Therapeutic strategies

Identifiers

PMID40183435
PMCPMC11978427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.