ArticleJournal of proteome research2025
Identification of Salivary Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer by Integrating Olink Proteomics and Metabolomics.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Colorectal neoplasia-specific amino acid profiles and their diagnostic potential: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Pooled it
- ROMP-Derived Coumarin-Tyrosine Polymeric Chemosensors: A Biomolecule-Inspired Metal-Ion-Free Approach for Arginine Sensing in Artificial Saliva.ACS polymers Au · 2026Article
- Proteomic analysis of saliva reveals changes in proteomic profiles during colorectal cancer in an Iranian cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Serum multiomics prediction of prognosis and adverse reactions to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Circulating proteins and metabolites panel for noninvasive preoperative diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Advances in colorectal cancer screening: technological innovations, guideline discrepancies, and individualized strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying novel biomarkers is crucial for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). Saliva, as a noninvasive sample, holds promise for CRC detection. Here, we used Olink proteomics and untargeted metabolomics to analyze saliva samples from CRC patients and healthy controls with the aim of identifying candidate biomarkers in CRC saliva. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed 16 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and 40 differentially accumulated metabolites (DAMs). Pathway enrichment showed DEPs were mainly involved in cancer transcriptional dysregulation, Toll-like receptor signaling, and chemokine signaling. Metabolomics analysis highlighted significant changes in amino acid metabolites, particularly in pathways such as arginine biosynthesis, histidine metabolism, and cysteine and methionine metabolism. Random forest analysis and ELISA validation identified four potential biomarkers: succinate, l-methionine, GZMB, and MMP12. A combined protein-metabolite diagnostic model was developed using logistic regression, achieving an area under the curve of 0.933 (95% CI: 0.871-0.996) for the discovery cohort and 0.969 (95% CI: 0.918-1.000) for the validation cohort, effectively distinguishing CRC patients from healthy individuals. In conclusion, our study identified and validated a panel of noninvasive saliva-based biomarkers that could improve CRC screening and provide new insights into clinical CRC diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.