ArticlePeerJ2025
Adoption of a biologically-enhanced agricultural management (BEAM) approach in agroecosystems for regenerating soil fertility, improving farm profitability and achieving productive utilization of atmospheric CO
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A 4-year field study, on the adoption of a Biologically-Enhanced Agricultural Management (BEAM) protocol, in a cotton/cover-crop rotation in Turkey, was designed to observe "change-over-time" of soil organic carbon (SOC%) and total soil nitrogen (TSN%) at three soil profile depths (0-15 cm, 15-30 cm and 30-45 cm) while tracking farm productivity and profitability. Methods: BEAM systems employ regenerative practices: (a) no-till, (b) no, or reduced synthetic nutrient amendments, (c) continuous roots in the ground (commodity/cover), accompanied with an injection (in-furrow at planting) of an extract of beneficial microbes, from a Johnson-Su bioreactor. Three field nitrogen treatments: (1) BEAM+100% N (203 kg N ha Results: The SOC%, in the 0-15 cm soil profile demonstrated a significant increase from 0.39% SOC to 1.83% SOC, for a total increase of 1.44%, over the 4-year study period, (y = 0.3136x + 0.1206; r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.