ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Prevalence of large vessel occlusions in an unselected hospital-based stroke cohort in Sweden.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health Economic & Implementation Determinants of Prehospital Stroke Triage Tools: A Systematic Review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Pooled it
- Circle of Willis-Guided Localization for Simultaneous Detection and Classification of Large Vessel Occlusions in Brain CTA.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Factors influencing functional recovery in posterior circulation stroke following mechanical thrombectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Determining the prevalence of large vessel occlusions (LVOs) is important for planning and accessing mechanical thrombectomy treatment. Previous estimates vary greatly in studies, which might be related to different inclusion criteria and/or selection bias. In this cohort study, we aimed to determine the presence of LVO in an unselected, i.e., untriaged, hospital-based stroke cohort in Sweden. Methods: Stroke patients treated at Karolinska Huddinge University Hospital were consecutively collected during the years 2008 through 2015, identified by an ICD-10 diagnosis of ischemic stroke (I63). Patients with LVO were selected through radiology reports indicating LVO. Results: A total of 3,152 consecutive patient events had received a diagnosis of ischemic stroke during the study period. A total of 356 occlusion events were found in the internal carotid artery, the first two segments of the middle cerebral artery (M1, M2), and anterior cerebral artery (A1, A2), the vertebral artery, basilar artery and the first two segments of the posterior cerebral artery (P1, P2). This resulted in an LVO prevalence of 11.3% in this cohort. Seventy-six percent of occlusions were located in the anterior circulation, and 24% in the posterior circulation. The most frequent occluded vessel was M1 ( Conclusion: In this study of consecutively collected stroke patients the prevalence of LVO was lower compared to other studies, possibly related to our unselected patient cohort, limited use of CT angiography, and/or the LVO definition used. These results are of importance for decision-making regarding the capacity of comprehensive stroke centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.