ArticleBJR case reports2025
CT-like MR images to assess changes after radiotherapy for bone metastasis: a case report.
Article in BJR case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Setting the echo time to zero allows for the acquisition of bone images that were otherwise difficult to obtain with conventional MRI and clear visualization of CT-like MR images. This technique is mainly useful for detecting compression fractures; however, studies examining bone tumours have been lacking. Furthermore, no reports to date have investigated the usefulness of MRI for evaluating images before and after radiotherapy (RT) for bone tumours. Therefore, plain CT and MRI (T1/T2-weighted image and CT-like MRI) were performed under the same conditions before and after radiation therapy (RT) and examined the obtained images. An 86-year-old man received RT (30 Gy/3 fraction) for painful lumbar metastasis from prostate cancer. At 2 months after RT, no changes in T2-weighted images and plain CT scans were noted, but CT-like MRI showed an increase in the signal inside the bone metastasis. Examining how the images change over time is imperative given the difficulty of predicting the duration of the pain relief effects of RT for bone metastases. Therefore, the current case report explored whether combining various modalities, such as CT and MRI, could predict prognosis. We highlight the importance of investigating whether signal changes are correlated with pain symptoms and whether MRI can be a predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.