ReviewTobacco induced diseases2025
Trends in academic research on thirdhand smoke using bibliometric analysis.
Review in Tobacco induced diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thirdhand Smoke and Neonatal/Pediatric Health: A Scoping Review on Nursing Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study used quantitative analysis to explore the current landscape of thirdhand smoke (THS) research by identifying gaps and emerging trends. Despite growing evidence of health risks associated with THS, research remains sparse, and no public policies address THS exposure. This analysis aimed to inform future studies and policies, in order to mitigate THS-related health risks.
methodsUsing a bibliometric approach, our literature search identified 227 academic articles and reviews indexed in PubMed between 2009 and 2023. We used Biblioshiny, a bibliometrix R package, VOSviewer, and Excel to analyze the bibliographic data.
resultsSince 2009, an average growth of 14.09% annually has been observed in THS-related publications. Additionally, we found that US institutions are major contributors to THS research. At the country level, studies conducted in the US, China, Spain, Italy, and South Korea are the most prevalent in the THS literature. Our findings indicate that THS research mainly focuses on human participants, health promotion, nicotiana/chemistry, air pollution/indoor analysis, tobacco smoke pollution, adolescent health, odorants/analysis, surface properties, carcinogens, and disease models/animals.
conclusionsWe analyzed THS research trends and identified the most impactful authors, journals, institutions, and countries. Considering the findings of this study, policymakers should continue policy development and implementation efforts to address THS exposure. The findings of this study can serve as basic reference material for scholars to guide future research directions regarding THS research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.