Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182984›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Prediction Models for Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Nonimaging Machine Learning Approaches: A Regional Multicenter Study.

Yusuke Takeda, Yutaka Kaneko, Masahiko Sugimoto, Hidetoshi Yamashita, Ayako Sasaki, Tetsuo Mitsui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yusuke TakedaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Yutaka KanekoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Masahiko SugimotoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Hidetoshi YamashitaYamagata City Institute of Public Health, Yamagata, Japan.
Ayako SasakiDepartment of Pediatrics, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Tetsuo MitsuiDepartment of Pediatrics, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To develop nonimaging machine learning models using clinical data from the first screening to predict the occurrence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Design: This multicenter regional study was conducted in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. Participants: We collected clinical data of neonates born between October 2016 and September 2018 and screened in 4 neonatal care units. Methods: The 35 variables available at the first screening were used as possible predictors to develop a decision tree, a random forest, a gradient-boosted tree, a neural network, and a Naive Bayes model. Parameter tuning was performed using a 10-fold cross-validation. This process was repeated 200 times using different random seeds for data partitioning. Main Outcome Measures: The target outcome was the final ROP outcome (i.e., the development of any stage of ROP during hospitalization). Results: Of the 215 neonates screened, 43 (20.0%) developed ROP. The median gestational age was 31.4 (interquartile range: 28.1-33.4) weeks, and the median birth weight was 1502 (interquartile range: 967-1823) g. The mean 200-iteration area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the random forest model were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.99), 90.1% (95% CI 84.1-95.2), 95.7% (95% CI 88.2-100), and 66.0% (95% CI 41.7-91.7), respectively. The mean 200-iteration AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Naive Bayes model were 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.99), 90.6% (95% CI 84.1-96.8), 94.6% (95% CI 86.3-100), and 73.6% (95% CI 50.0-91.7), respectively. Conclusions: Nonimaging machine learning methods have shown high performance in predicting the occurrence of ROP. These models can be beneficial when a fundus camera cannot capture images due to eye opacity and for hospitals that lack pediatric fundus cameras. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Machine learningMulticenter studyNonimagingRetinopathy of prematurity

Identifiers

PMID40182984
PMCPMC11964644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.