ArticleOphthalmology science
Prediction Models for Retinopathy of Prematurity Using Nonimaging Machine Learning Approaches: A Regional Multicenter Study.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Two AI Chatbots for Diagnosis and Providing Treatment Suggestions in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity using machine learning models.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Clinical indicators associated with pericardial effusion in rheumatoid arthritis: a machine learning-based analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Detection of pediatric cataracts through non-invasive facial photography using deep convolutional neural networks for early diagnosis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Development of a non-invasive diagnostic model for severe Retinopathy of Prematurity integrating clinical and platelet data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk prediction models for retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop nonimaging machine learning models using clinical data from the first screening to predict the occurrence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Design: This multicenter regional study was conducted in Yamagata Prefecture, Japan. Participants: We collected clinical data of neonates born between October 2016 and September 2018 and screened in 4 neonatal care units. Methods: The 35 variables available at the first screening were used as possible predictors to develop a decision tree, a random forest, a gradient-boosted tree, a neural network, and a Naive Bayes model. Parameter tuning was performed using a 10-fold cross-validation. This process was repeated 200 times using different random seeds for data partitioning. Main Outcome Measures: The target outcome was the final ROP outcome (i.e., the development of any stage of ROP during hospitalization). Results: Of the 215 neonates screened, 43 (20.0%) developed ROP. The median gestational age was 31.4 (interquartile range: 28.1-33.4) weeks, and the median birth weight was 1502 (interquartile range: 967-1823) g. The mean 200-iteration area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the random forest model were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83-0.99), 90.1% (95% CI 84.1-95.2), 95.7% (95% CI 88.2-100), and 66.0% (95% CI 41.7-91.7), respectively. The mean 200-iteration AUC-ROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Naive Bayes model were 0.94 (95% CI 0.86-0.99), 90.6% (95% CI 84.1-96.8), 94.6% (95% CI 86.3-100), and 73.6% (95% CI 50.0-91.7), respectively. Conclusions: Nonimaging machine learning methods have shown high performance in predicting the occurrence of ROP. These models can be beneficial when a fundus camera cannot capture images due to eye opacity and for hospitals that lack pediatric fundus cameras. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.