ArticleOphthalmology science
Long-Term Monitoring of Corneal Grafts Via Anterior Segment OCT Pachymetry Maps.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anterior Segment OCT Features of Cytomegalovirus Endotheliitis Mimicking Graft Rejection After DSAEK: Report of Two Cases and Diagnostic Implications.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2026Article
- Applications of Modern Cell Therapies: The Latest Data in Ophthalmology.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of recipient and donor factors on corneal graft clearance: insights from serial anterior segment optical coherence tomography.AJO international · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Corneal Morphological and Optical Parameters in Predicting DSAEK Surgery Outcome.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Screening and Grading of Textural Interface Opacities in DSAEK Grafts with the M-TIO Scale for Predicting Visual Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the efficacy of anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) in the long-term monitoring of corneal grafts and its integration into a hybrid remote care model for early detection and management of graft rejection or failure. Design: Prospective cohort study. Participants: Seventy-four patients (93 eyes) who underwent corneal transplantation from October 2021 to December 2023, with a follow-up period of ≥6 months. Methods: Serial AS-OCT pachymetry maps and cross-sectional scans were performed at fixed postoperative intervals, and the findings were correlated with clinical signs of graft rejection or failure on slit lamp examination for thickness changes >50 μm. A hybrid remote AS-OCT screening protocol was initiated 1 week postoperatively. Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic accuracy of AS-OCT, measured by specificity and sensitivity, in detecting graft rejection or failure through changes in corneal and graft thickness. Results: Anterior segment OCT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy with a specificity of 97.6% and a sensitivity of 88.9% in detecting graft rejection or failure. The mean central corneal thickness increase in cases resulting in graft rejection or failure was 82.7 ± 21.5 μm, a thickness change that is not discernible by slit lamp examination alone. The utility of AS-OCT in a hybrid remote monitoring model was demonstrated through 3 detailed case studies, highlighting improved clinical workflow and patient convenience without compromising postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: Serial AS-OCT imaging serves as a robust, objective, and quantitative tool for postoperative surveillance of corneal grafts, significantly benefiting patient outcomes by allowing timely interventions. Integration of AS-OCT into a hybrid remote screening protocol supports comprehensive monitoring, complementing direct clinical evaluations and optimizing postoperative care. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.