ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2025
Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometer in Measuring Gluteal Muscle Rate of Torque Development and Peak Torque: Push and Pull Configurations.
Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of maximum isokinetic hip and knee strength measurements with the exoskeleton in healthy young adults.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Belt-stabilized handheld dynamometers (HHD) assess hip rate of torque development (RTD) and strength in research and clinical practice. However, the reliability of HHD with push and pull configurations to measure hip muscles RTD and peak torque is unclear. Purpose/Hypothesis: To determine the intra- and inter-reliability of HHD utilizing push and pull configurations to measure hip abduction and extension early (0-100ms) and late (100-200ms) phases RTD and peak torque. We hypothesized HHD with both configurations would be reliable for measuring hip extension and abduction RTD and peak torque. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty healthy adults (10 females) performed three consecutive maximal isometric contraction trials of hip abduction and extension, utilizing an HHD with push and pull configurations by two raters. Each rater's average early and late phases RTD and peak torque of hip abduction and extension were utilized for analysis. Results: Intra-rater reliability of hip abduction with push and pull configurations ranged moderate-to-good for early and late RTD phases (push: ICC2,1=0.61-0.88; pull: ICC2,1=0.59-0.75). Peak hip abduction torque showed good reliability in both configurations (ICC2,1≥0.79). Hip extension ranged moderate-to-good reliability for early and late RTD phases in push configuration (ICC2,1=0.72-0.87), with good-to-excellent reliability in pull (ICC2,1=0.77-0.91). Peak hip extension torque showed moderate-to-excellent reliability for push configuration (ICC2,1=0.73-0.92) and excellent reliability for pull (ICC2,1≥0.91). Inter-rater reliability for hip abduction showed moderate in push (ICC3,k≥0.72) and good in pull (ICC3,k≥0.78) configurations for both RTD phases, while hip extension showed good reliability in push (ICC3,k≥0.82) and excellent reliability in pull (ICC3,k≥0.95) configurations. Peak torque showed good reliability for hip abduction (ICC3,k≥0.83) and excellent reliability for extension (ICC3,k≥0.94) in both configurations. Conclusions: HHD with push and pull configurations is a reliable and cost-effective method for assessing RTD and strength of hip abductors and extensors in healthy adults. Level of Evidence: Level 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.