Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182893›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025

Free-Functioning Muscle Transfers After Major Upper Limb Replantation.

Pedro C Cavadas, Tina M Y Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pedro C CavadasClinica Cavadas, Reconstructive Surgery, Valencia, Spain.
Tina M Y LeeClinica Cavadas, Reconstructive Surgery, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Major upper limb replantation surgery is a complex undertaking that often requires secondary reconstructive procedures to improve function. The loss of critical functional muscle groups in the forearm was once considered a relative contraindication for replantation. The advent of free-functioning muscle transfers (FFMTs) has expanded the boundaries for replantation. In this study, we seeked to review the indications, surgical considerations, and outcomes of the use of FFMTs after major upper limb replantation. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included patients who underwent replantation surgery for amputations at or proximal to the forearm and subsequent FFMTs for reconstruction of motor function. Results: A total of 16 patients received 20 FFMTs between the period of 1998 and 2022. These were all used to reconstruct finger flexion or finger extension or both. All patients underwent secondary procedures to further augment functional outcomes after FFMT surgery. Conclusions: Free-functioning muscle transfers serve as a useful reconstructive tool for restoration of motor function following major upper limb replantation. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Indexed as

FFMTFunctioning muscle transferMajor amputationMajor replantationUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID40182893
PMCPMC11963101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.