ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
Comparison of Surgical Techniques and Joint Injections for Base of Thumb Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Perspectives After Trapeziectomy Versus Carpometacarpal Prosthesis: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Ten Bilateral Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To perform an updated systematic review investigating the various surgical and injection interventions for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from inception to April 2024 to identify prospective, randomized studies comparing surgical and/or minimally invasive interventions for thumb CMC joint osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Reference lists of previous reviews were screened to identify additional publications. Qualitative analysis was performed for primary and secondary outcomes based on the direction of effect (statistically higher, lower, or no difference) because of marked heterogeneity of data and inadequate statistical power. Cochrane's risk of bias 2 tool assessed the quality of included studies. Results: Seventeen studies encompassing 1,166 thumbs were included in this review. Fourteen studies compared surgical interventions, whereas three studies compared various intra-articular injections. Five studies had a low risk of bias, eight had a moderate risk of bias, and four had a high risk of bias. Regarding primary outcomes, there was no difference in function between trapeziectomy and arthroplasty, key pinch strength between partial and total trapeziectomy, and pain and function between trapeziectomy and arthrodesis. Arthrodesis was associated with a higher complication rate compared with trapeziectomy. Platelet-rich plasma injections had improved pain, function, and patient satisfaction outcomes compared with corticosteroid injections. Conclusions: No surgical intervention was superior to the other for treating the first CMC joint osteoarthritis. Trapeziectomy remains the simplest and one of the most established surgical modalities with good long-term outcomes and acceptable side effect profiles. Platelet-rich plasma injections may be a useful alternative to corticosteroids in first CMC osteoarthritis. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.