Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182832›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Elective Sigmoid Resection for Complicated Diverticulitis.

Peyton Margaret Weaver Murdock, Alexander Carmelo Venero, Robert Eric Heidel, Blake William Hale, Andrew Joseph Russ

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peyton Margaret Weaver MurdockUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Alexander Carmelo VeneroUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Robert Eric HeidelUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Blake William HaleUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Andrew Joseph RussUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Minimally invasive surgical techniques for colorectal surgery have continued to grow in prevalence with robotic surgery potentially providing advantages in complex pelvic operations. We sought to examine the outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic elective sigmoid colon resection for complicated diverticulitis. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients at an academic tertiary care center from 2018-2023 who underwent elective minimally invasive sigmoid colon resections for complicated diverticulitis. Multiple regression analysis was performed with primary outcomes being reoperation within 30 days and overall complications. Secondary outcomes included conversion to open, estimated blood loss, operative time, days until return of bowel function, and length of stay. Results: In this cohort of 131 patients, 38 underwent laparoscopic colectomy and 93 patients underwent robotic colectomy. There were no significant differences between rate of reoperation (7.7% vs 2.1%, Conclusion: Robotic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis had mostly equivalent outcomes at this institution. There was some decrease in estimated blood loss, however, operative time was increased in the robotic group.

Indexed as

ColectomyColon, SigmoidDiverticulitis, ColonicElective Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsColectomy for diverticular fistulaMinimally invasive colon surgeryRobotic pelvic surgery outcomesSurgical management chronic diverticular disease

Identifiers

PMID40182832
PMCPMC11967722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.