Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182802›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025

The acceptability, feasibility, and usability of a virtual reality pain education and rehabilitation program for Veterans: a mixed-methods study.

Amelia K Mardon, Dianne Wilson, Hayley B Leake, Daniel Harvie, Andre Andrade, K Jane Chalmers, Aaron Bowes, G Lorimer Moseley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amelia K MardonIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Dianne WilsonIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Hayley B LeakeIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Daniel HarvieIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Andre AndradeQuality Use of Medicine Research Centre, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
K Jane ChalmersIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Aaron BowesIPAR Rehabilitation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
G Lorimer MoseleyIIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Persistent pain is a leading cause of medical discharges for Veterans. Pain science education (PSE) aims to better people's understanding about pain and is effective at reducing pain and depressive symptoms in Veterans. Preliminary evidence suggests virtual reality (VR)-delivered PSE has clinical benefits for people with persistent pain. This study investigated the acceptability, feasibility, and usability for VR-PSE for Veterans with persistent pain. Methods: Veterans ( Results: The VR-PSE program was considered easy to use, engaging, and adaptable for different functional capabilities. Appropriate screening for contraindications prior to using the VR-PSE program was considered important by HCPs. Both Veterans and HCPs emphasized the need for a trusting client-clinician relationship to improve the acceptability of the VR-PSE program. Discussion: Overall, the VR-PSE program was found to be acceptable, feasible, and usable and may be a useful tool to incorporate into the clinical management of Veterans with persistent pain. Further research is needed to investigate the efficacy of VR-PSE programs on clinical outcomes for Veterans with persistent pain.

Indexed as

acceptabilitychronic painmixed methodspain educationpain science educationVeteransvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40182802
PMCPMC11965608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.