Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182766›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Identification of causative agents of infective endocarditis by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of resected valves.

Vladimir Lazarevic, Nadia Gaïa, Truong-Thanh Pham, Mikaël de Lorenzi-Tognon, Myriam Girard, Florian Mauffrey, Yannick Charretier, Gesuele Renzi, Christoph Huber, Jacques Schrenzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vladimir Lazarevic *Genomic Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nadia Gaïa *Genomic Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Truong-Thanh PhamDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.
Mikaël de Lorenzi-TognonGenomic Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Myriam GirardGenomic Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Florian MauffreyGenomic Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yannick CharretierGenomic Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Gesuele RenziLaboratory of Bacteriology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Diagnostics, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.
Christoph Huber *Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Geneva, Switzerland.
Jacques Schrenzel *Genomic Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare and life-threatening condition with considerable mortality rates. Diagnosis is often complicated by negative blood culture results, limiting the accurate identification of causative pathogens. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cardiac valve specimens compared to conventional clinical laboratory methods for identifying pathogens in IE. Methods: Nineteen patients with suspected IE who were scheduled for surgical valve removal were prospectively enrolled. The metagenomic workflow included bacterial DNA enrichment from resected valves using the Molzym Ultra-Deep Microbiome Prep, sequencing of metagenomic libraries using the Illumina MiSeq platform, and Kraken 2 taxonomic assignments based on read data. Results: Valve mNGS achieved a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 100% relative to the final adjudicated pathogen diagnosis. Blood culture, considered the reference standard, exhibited slightly higher sensitivity (88.2%) with comparable specificity (100%). In comparison, valve culture (sensitivity: 29.4%, specificity: 50.0%) and microscopy (sensitivity: 35.3%, specificity: 100%) showed lower diagnostic performance. Delays between blood culture negativization and valve resection impacted mNGS sensitivity, likely due to pathogen clearance. Notably, valves resected within 12 days from blood culture negativization achieved 100% diagnostic accuracy, emphasizing the importance of timing for optimal mNGS results. Conclusion: This study underscores mNGS as a valuable diagnostic tool for detecting IE pathogens, complementing traditional diagnostic methods. The detection of antibiotic resistance genes and multi-locus sequence typing profiles in some samples further demonstrated its utility.

Indexed as

BacteriaEndocarditisHeart ValvesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, Bacterialcardiac surgeryclinical metagenomicsheart valvemicrobiomenext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40182766
PMCPMC11966046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.