Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182663›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2025

Sparse connectivity enables efficient information processing in cortex-like artificial neural networks.

Rieke Fruengel, Marcel Oberlaender

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rieke FruengelIn Silico Brain Sciences Group, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn, Germany.
Marcel OberlaenderIn Silico Brain Sciences Group, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in cortical networks are very sparsely connected; even neurons whose axons and dendrites overlap are highly unlikely to form a synaptic connection. What is the relevance of such sparse connectivity for a network's function? Surprisingly, it has been shown that sparse connectivity impairs information processing in artificial neural networks (ANNs). Does this imply that sparse connectivity also impairs information processing in biological neural networks? Although ANNs were originally inspired by the brain, conventional ANNs differ substantially in their structural network architecture from cortical networks. To disentangle the relevance of these structural properties for information processing in networks, we systematically constructed ANNs constrained by interpretable features of cortical networks. We find that in large and recurrently connected networks, as are found in the cortex, sparse connectivity facilitates time- and data-efficient information processing. We explore the origins of these surprising findings and show that conventional dense ANNs distribute information across only a very small fraction of nodes, whereas sparse ANNs distribute information across more nodes. We show that sparsity is most critical in networks with fixed excitatory and inhibitory nodes, mirroring neuronal cell types in cortex. This constraint causes a large learning delay in densely connected networks which is eliminated by sparse connectivity. Taken together, our findings show that sparse connectivity enables efficient information processing given key constraints from cortical networks, setting the stage for further investigation into higher-order features of cortical connectivity.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsAnimalsHumansNeural Pathwaysartificial neural networksconnectivitycortexrecurrentsparsestructure–function

Identifiers

PMID40182663
PMCPMC11966417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.