ArticleAdvances in rehabilitation science and practice
A Community Reintegration Model for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in South Africa: Process and Outcomes.
Article in Advances in rehabilitation science and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rehospitalization Burden Profiles After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Data-Driven Latent Class Analysis of the SCIMS Public-Use Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- SPINE20 recommendations 2025: Sustainable spine care for all.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap: The experiences and needs of people with spinal cord injury when transitioning out of inpatient rehabilitation.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury impacts physical functioning, independence, and quality of life. The high incidence rate of 75.6 per million in South Africa indicate the crucial role of successful community reintegration. Despite South African's policy emphasizing comprehensive rehabilitation of persons with disabilities, community reintegration following spinal cord injury remains inadequate. Objective: To develop a multidimensional model to improve community reintegration for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries in South Africa. Methods: A 4-phase mixed methods study was employed. Phase 1 used a cross-sectional survey of 108 individuals with spinal cord injuries to investigate levels and factors influencing psychosocial and community reintegration. Phase 2 involved 28 qualitative interviews with different content experts, including individuals with spinal cord injuries, caregivers, rehabilitation professionals, and persons representing people with disabilities in the communities. Phase 3 reviewed existing community reintegration programs, while Phase 4 used a Delphi technique with 10 experts to design and refine program components and strategies. Results: The study revealed low levels of psychosocial and community reintegration, influenced by employment and housing factors. Content experts highlighted barriers such as inaccessible environments, transportation challenges, and negative societal attitudes. Program components included technological support, employment assistance, mentorship, and recreational activities. The first 3 phases informed a development of a 3-level model addressing client, community, and legislative domains. In the fourth phase, experts reached consensus on components and strategies to achieve this multi-level community reintegration model. Conclusion: The evidence-based community reintegration model offers a structured, multi-level framework to address reintegration challenges in South Africa. It emphasizes coordinated interventions at individual, community, and policy levels to improve outcomes for individuals with traumatic spinal cord injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.