Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182650›Full record

ArticleStroke research and treatment2025

Validation of the Malta Gait Scale: A Time-Efficient Tool for Poststroke Assessment.

Valerio Sarmati, Carlos Carmona, Alessandro Morciano, Samuel Gutiérrez, Ingrid Velásquez, José Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valerio SarmatiSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0417-7578
Carlos CarmonaStroke Therapy Revolution Ltd, Marsalforn, Malta.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-8707
Alessandro MorcianoStroke Therapy Revolution Ltd, Marsalforn, Malta.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-7714
Samuel GutiérrezHospital Virgen De Las Montañas, Villamartin, Andalucía, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6948-5451
Ingrid VelásquezUniversidad de Carabobo, Valencia, Carabobo, Venezuela.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5522-0161
José FernándezUniversidad de Carabobo, Valencia, Carabobo, Venezuela.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-7851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 80% of stroke survivors experience walking dysfunction, impacting quality of life. Rehabilitation is crucial for gait recovery, and accurate assessments facilitate tailored programs. While computerized gait analysis is the gold standard, it is costly and requires specialized training, making observational gait analysis (OGA) more common. However, OGA can also be time-consuming. This study validates the Malta Gait Scale (MGS), a concise, illustrated 7-item observational tool using video recordings for gait measurements. The aim is to provide an effective, time-efficient method for gait evaluations by comparing the MGS with the established Wisconsin Gait Scale (WGS) and Gait Assessment Intervention Tool (GAIT), which have 14 and 31 items, respectively. Forty-nine participants were included in a retrospective study to validate the MGS. We evaluated its reliability using weighted Cohen's kappa (

Indexed as

Malta Gait Scaleobservational gait analysisphysiotherapy practicestroke rehabilitationwalking dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID40182650
PMCPMC11968151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.