ArticleExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2025
Real-world outcomes of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Article in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of cabozantinib plus nivolumab and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.International urology and nephrology · 2026Observational
- Future perspectives: targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab (Len + Pembro) demonstrated significant efficacy in the phase 3 CLEAR study for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, poor-risk patients represented only a small proportion of the trial population. This multicenter retrospective cohort study assessed the real-world efficacy and safety of Len + Pembro in patients with clear-cell metastatic RCC and intermediate or poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Sixty patients were analyzed, with a median age of 56 years. Poor risk was identified in 53% of patients, and 90% had metastases to ≥ 2 organs. ORR was 48.33%, disease control rate was 86.7%, and median PFS was 19.0 months. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 25% of patients, with 33.3% requiring lenvatinib dose reductions. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated robust efficacy and a manageable safety profile in a real-world population with advanced disease and poor-risk features, consistent with outcomes reported in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.