ArticleEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2025
Left atrial strain by vendor-neutral echocardiography software in healthy subjects: vendor comparisons and associated factors.
Article in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Atrial Remodeling in Atrial Fibrillation Using Dynamic HeartModel and AutoStrain LA.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Combined prediction of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and left atrial reservoir strain: A prospective observational study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Observational
- Development of a Framework for Echocardiographic Image Quality Assessment and Its Application in CRT-D/ICD Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Validation of a Manual Method for Measuring Left Atrial Reservoir Strain Against Automated Speckle Tracking Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Left atrial strains [reservoir (LASr), conduit (LAScd), and contractile (LASct)] are increasingly utilized, primarily in the areas of heart failure and valvulopathy. Commercially available software to measure strain are marketed as imaging machine vendor independent, although the normal ranges of their performance and external validation studies are lacking. We evaluated and compared LAS values, reference ranges, and associated factors using contemporary strain software. Methods and results: Healthy subjects ( Conclusion: EchoPAC and Epsilon have lower magnitude mean LAS values compared with TomTec and VVI, and all software were vendor neutral except EchoPAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.