ArticleArab journal of urology2025
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Versius surgical platform: An objective criticism and a guide for an optimal surgical setup.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and functional outcomes of Versius surgical platform in prostate cancer radical prostatectomy: a single arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This was an observational study aiming at providing a guide for an optimal setup of the Versius robotic system and evaluating its performance in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and methods: Between July 2022 and December 2022, all patients with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy were included. Patients who had previous abdominal surgeries or were unfit for pneumoperitoneum were excluded. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected. RARP was performed through 5 ports (12 mm); 3 for the robotic arms, 1 for the camera, and 1 for the assistant surgeon. Repeated adjustments of the patient's position and port distribution along with the bedside unit's configuration, arrangement, and orientation were made until an optimal setup was achieved. The technical malfunctions were identified in each case and fixed in the subsequent ones. All patients were invited to the follow-up clinic for routine visits on the first and second weeks following surgery and then every month for three months. Results: Thirty patients underwent the procedure without conversion to laparoscopy or open surgery and abided by the follow-up regimen. The first nine cases required frequent setup adjustments due to recurring alarms and arms-related conflicts. Thenceforth, the mean docking time, console time, urethro-vesical anastomosis time, and total operative time were enhanced in the last 21 cases without system alarms. No major intraoperative complications related to the robotic system utilization were reported. The postoperative course of all participants passed uneventfully. The median length of the hospital stay and catheterization time were 2 (1-2) and 7 (7-10) days, respectively. Conclusion: The Versius system offers a promising robotic platform with a flexible surgical setup. The proposed setup provides a guide for a smooth performance in RARP with minimal instruments' collision to eschew system failure. Being the first generation of this surgical robotic system, future efforts are still needed to improve its performance and minimize its drawbacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.