ReviewArab journal of urology2025
Implementing VIRADS score for image-guided assessment of muscle invasiveness in bladder cancer pre-TURBT: An updated meta-analysis.
Review in Arab journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- What's next for VI-RADS? Updates and future perspectives from the ACR VI-RADS steering committee.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Review
- Review
- The diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging vesical imaging-reporting and data system combined with tumor contact length for assessing muscle invasion in bladder cancer lesions scored vesical imaging-reporting and data system 3: A single-center retrospective analysis.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
- Synergy of PET and MR imaging in the local and regional staging of bladder cancer.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder urothelial carcinoma is the most prevalent malignancy of the urinary system worldwide. Accurate staging of bladder cancer, particularly distinguishing between non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), is essential for determining appropriate treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) scoring system using multiparametric MRI in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the VI-RADS scoring system using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish between NMIBC and MIBC were included. Data from eligible studies were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, and heterogeneity was assessed using meta-regression and subgroup analyses by using STATA V17.0. Results: A total of 31 studies, comprising 3,798 bladder cancer patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting MIBC using a VI-RADS cutoff score of ≥ 3 was 89%, with moderate heterogeneity observed across studies. Subgroup analysis revealed variations in diagnostic performance based on geographic location (North America, Europe, and Asia), MRI technical parameters, and study design. Studies utilizing 3.0 Tesla MRI scanners and those involving multiple radiologists demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: The VI-RADS system demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between NMIBC and MIBC, with a cutoff score of ≥ 3 yielding optimal sensitivity and specificity. Its integration into clinical practice has the potential to reduce the need for invasive procedures, improve staging accuracy, and expedite treatment decisions. Future research should focus on standardizing MRI protocols and further validating these findings across diverse clinical settings to enhance the utility of VI-RADS in bladder cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.