Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182574›Full record

ReviewArab journal of urology2025

Implementing VIRADS score for image-guided assessment of muscle invasiveness in bladder cancer pre-TURBT: An updated meta-analysis.

Ahmad R Al-Qudimat, Doaa Sabir, Muna Elamin, Mica Ching, Seif B Altahtamouni, Kalpana Singh, Ibrahim A Khalil, Khalid Alrumaihi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arab journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What's next for VI-RADS? Updates and future perspectives from the ACR VI-RADS steering committee.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmad R Al-QudimatSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-7244
Doaa SabirSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2664-9559
Muna ElaminSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9318-0893
Mica ChingSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Seif B AltahtamouniSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Kalpana SinghSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Ibrahim A KhalilDepartment of Urology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-5099
Khalid AlrumaihiDepartment of Urology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9390-4011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bladder urothelial carcinoma is the most prevalent malignancy of the urinary system worldwide. Accurate staging of bladder cancer, particularly distinguishing between non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), is essential for determining appropriate treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) scoring system using multiparametric MRI in differentiating NMIBC from MIBC. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023. Studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the VI-RADS scoring system using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish between NMIBC and MIBC were included. Data from eligible studies were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, and heterogeneity was assessed using meta-regression and subgroup analyses by using STATA V17.0. Results: A total of 31 studies, comprising 3,798 bladder cancer patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting MIBC using a VI-RADS cutoff score of ≥ 3 was 89%, with moderate heterogeneity observed across studies. Subgroup analysis revealed variations in diagnostic performance based on geographic location (North America, Europe, and Asia), MRI technical parameters, and study design. Studies utilizing 3.0 Tesla MRI scanners and those involving multiple radiologists demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: The VI-RADS system demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between NMIBC and MIBC, with a cutoff score of ≥ 3 yielding optimal sensitivity and specificity. Its integration into clinical practice has the potential to reduce the need for invasive procedures, improve staging accuracy, and expedite treatment decisions. Future research should focus on standardizing MRI protocols and further validating these findings across diverse clinical settings to enhance the utility of VI-RADS in bladder cancer management.

Indexed as

Bladder cancermeta-analysissystematic reviewurothelial carcinomaVI-RADS

Identifiers

PMID40182574
PMCPMC11963189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.