Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182559›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Enhancing yield prediction in maize breeding using UAV-derived RGB imagery: a novel classification-integrated regression approach.

Haixiao Ge, Qi Zhang, Min Shen, Yang Qin, Lin Wang, Cansheng Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haixiao GeCollege of Rural Revitalization, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, China.
Qi ZhangInstitute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Min ShenCollege of Rural Revitalization, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, China.
Yang QinCollege of Rural Revitalization, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, China.
Lin WangCollege of Rural Revitalization, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, China.
Cansheng YuanCollege of Rural Revitalization, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate grain yield prediction is crucial for optimizing agricultural practices and ensuring food security. This study introduces a novel classification-integrated regression approach to improve maize yield prediction using UAV-derived RGB imagery. We compared three classifiers-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF)-to categorize yield data into low, medium, and high classes. Among these, SVM achieved the highest classification accuracy and was selected for classifying data prior to regression. Two methodologies were evaluated: Method 1 (direct RF regression on the full dataset) and Method 2 (SVM classification followed by class-specific RF regression). Multi-temporal vegetation indices (VIs) were analyzed across key growth stages, with the early vegetative phase yielding the lowest prediction errors. Method 2 significantly outperformed Method 1, reducing RMSE by 45.1% in calibration (0.28 t/ha vs. 0.51 t/ha) and 3.3% in validation (0.89 t/ha vs. 0.92 t/ha). This integrated framework demonstrates the advantage of combining classification and regression for precise yield estimation, providing a scalable tool for maize breeding programs. The results highlight the potential of UAV-based phenotyping to enhance agricultural productivity and support global food systems.

Indexed as

maizepre-regression classificationrandom forestUAV-based imageryyield prediction

Identifiers

PMID40182559
PMCPMC11965364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.