ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Development of a core competence model for improving medical college students' ability in respond to public health emergencies.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A cross-sectional study on the current status and influencing factors of core competencies among public health students.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Core competences has been developed for public health professionals worldwide. However, there is no core competences framework as to how to evaluate public health professionals and undergraduate students' ability to respond to public health emergencies. Objectives: To develop a framework of core competences in public health emergencies for education of medical college student who majored in public health. To assess the knowledge and skill level of undergraduate students with public health background in respond to health emergency event and get to known the training needs. Methods: The Delphi method was applied to develop an agreed list of competences, which was followed by the construction of a competences framework in public health emergencies. A questionnaire consists of items that was derived from the list of competency statements developed by Delphi scoring to quantitatively report the knowledge and practical skill level and training needs of medical college students of public health background in public health emergencies. Results: An agreed set of core competences containing 43 statements was derived from the first and second Delphi scoring steps which can be grouped into four domains: intellectual competences, practical competences, behavioral competences, personnel and motivation. A total of 441 undergraduate students with public health background participated in the survey. The average performance of intellectual and practical competences is 3 in a 5-point scale, which equals 60 converted to 100 points. A better performance was observed in indicators of behavioral competences and personnel and motivation with an average score of 4 for most of the items, which equals 80 converted to 100 points. Admission year and sex are significantly related to competency performance of all domains with Conclusion: A framework of 43 core competences was developed, which covered both technical and general competencies in public health emergencies and represent the current competence demands of public health work force to be qualified for their job roles in public health emergencies for the local government in Fujian province. The concordance rate regarding to score of importance of the core competences are all >80% in both the first and second round Delphi survey, suggesting considerable reliability of the framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.