Trial reportFrontiers in public health2025
Global randomized controlled trial of knowledge translation of children's environmental health.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Toxic chemicals can harm children's brain development, but the public's understanding of these harmful impacts is largely unknown. People's knowledge of toxic chemicals and their awareness of how to reduce children's exposure was examined. This study also assessed whether a video was efficacious in increasing knowledge about toxic chemicals and brain development and encouraging behavioral change to reduce exposure to toxic chemicals. Methods: 15,594 participants of child-bearing age (18-45 years old) from five countries (Canada, United States, United Kingdom, India, and Australia) were surveyed via CloudResearch's Prime Panels®. After completing a baseline survey, Prevention of Toxic Chemicals in the Environment for Children Tool (PRoTECT), participants were randomly assigned to watch a knowledge translation video (experimental group) or serve as a control group. Next, participants were asked about barriers and intentions to reduce exposure to toxic chemicals. After 6 weeks, a subset ( Results: Participants expressed strong preferences for lowering exposures and preventing disabilities. Participants who knew more about the impact of toxic chemicals on children's health were more likely to prefer investing in prevention and reducing their exposures. Participants who viewed the video showed significantly greater changes in PRoTECT scores. At the 6-week follow-up, no differences in behavioral changes were observed by group assignment, but two-thirds of all participants reported making changes to reduce their exposures and half intended to speak with their HCP. Conclusion: There were significant differences in knowledge and preferences by group assignment, but systemic barriers, such as cost of non-toxic products and difficulty determining how and where to buy them, hindered people from making changes to reduce their exposures to toxic chemicals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.