ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Development of evaluation index system for functional ability of older patients with stroke based on healthy aging: a modified Delphi study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of stroke in the older population is high and it is critical to promote and maintain the functional status of older patients post stroke. Health measures centered on functional ability can scientifically reflect the health status of older individuals. The aim of this study was to develop an evaluation index system for assessing the functional ability of older patients with stroke based on the World Health Organization Healthy Aging Model. Methods: Key indicators were identified through literature analysis and semi-structured interviews with 10 older patients with stroke. A two-round expert consultation process was conducted to evaluate and revise the indicators. Subsequently, a hierarchical construction model was established using the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weight of each level indicator. Results: The evaluation index system comprised three first-level, 13 s-level, and 53 third-level indicators. The weights ranged from 0.143-0.429 for first-level indicators, 0.052-0.349 for second-level indicators, and 0.040-0.667 for third-level indicators. Conclusion: The developed evaluation index system demonstrates reliability for assessing the functional ability of older stroke patients and provides a standardized framework for nursing staff to conduct functional assessment of older stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.