ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Techniques of Endoscope-Assisted Parotidectomy: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The modern-day parotidectomy has evolved considerably with the advent of plastic surgery and the introduction of endoscopes in minimally invasive head and neck surgery. The paper reviews various endoscopic-assisted approaches to parotidectomy that have been introduced over time by surgeons with respect to technique and surgical outcomes. Methods: We performed English language searches of Medline/PubMed and Embase databases till August 2022. We used 'parotidectomy' and the following text terms-endoscopic, endoscope assisted, and minimally invasive. Reference lists of the selected articles were screened to include relevant studies. The abstract and full text (in some cases) of each identified publication was screened for relevant data on novel approaches to endoscopic parotidectomy. Duplicate studies based on the same patient data sets and studies involving less than ten patients were excluded. Results and conclusions: The paper reviewed the endoscope-assisted preauricular approach, postauricular approach, using two small skin incisions, postauricular approach, retroauricular approach, hairline approach and intraoral approach. Though the studies conducted so far for comparing these techniques with conventional open parotidectomy have been encouraging with respect to cosmetic outcomes and complications, at present, the absence of well-designed prospective observational and interventional studies does not warrant them to be widely employed in clinical practice. This review will guide surgeons in performing endoscope-assisted parotidectomy incisions in selected patients and provide impetus to further study and improve these techniques. Currently, these should remain limited to the hands of experienced surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.