ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2025
Technology Guided Management of Orbital Trauma: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical management of orbital wall fractures in juveniles: a European multicenter study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of technology in the surgical field has been increasing; however, the literature that studies the combination of these techniques is still scarce. Purpose: This systematic review aims to identify the combination of the different technological tools currently available for surgical reconstruction of the orbit after trauma injury and determine the most common treatment alternatives. Methods: A search following PRISMA criterios was carried out of articles published between January 2015 and December 2019 in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid databases. The Mesh terms were orbit fracture, orbit trauma, computer-assisted surgery, surgical navigation system, navigation surgery, endoscopic surgical procedure, endoscopy, endoscope support, and patient-specific implants. The inclusion criteria were orbital trauma, articles that described the combination of technological tools, cases, case series, retrospective studies, and randomized clinical trials. Pediatric trauma management studies were excluded. To determine methodological quality and risk of bias the Joanna Briggs Institute Verification List (JBI) was used. The results were collected and presented in tables for easy interpretation. Results: Of the articles found, 12 were finally chosen. Most of the articles (8) were case series, 2 were case reports, 1 was quasi-experimental, and 1 was a randomized clinical trial. A total of 418 patients were reported in all studies, and the most widely used tool was virtual planning, reported in 11 articles (91.6%). Virtual surgical planning in combination with intraoperative navigation was adopted by 9 articles (75%), being the most used combination of technologies. Conclusions: Integration of virtual surgical planning, intraoperative navigation, patient-specific implants, and endoscopic techniques will help to improve the results significantly in the initial management of the orbital trauma. However, it is recommended in future studies that the results be evaluated in the same way to obtain more homogeneous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.