Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182395›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

A survey of model compression techniques: past, present, and future.

Defu Liu, Yixiao Zhu, Zhe Liu, Yi Liu, Changlin Han, Jinkai Tian, Ruihao Li, Wei Yi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Defu LiuIntelligent Game and Decision Lab (IGDL), Beijing, China.
Yixiao ZhuIntelligent Game and Decision Lab (IGDL), Beijing, China.
Zhe LiuIntelligent Game and Decision Lab (IGDL), Beijing, China.
Yi LiuIntelligent Game and Decision Lab (IGDL), Beijing, China.
Changlin HanIntelligent Game and Decision Lab (IGDL), Beijing, China.
Jinkai TianIntelligent Game and Decision Lab (IGDL), Beijing, China.
Ruihao LiIntelligent Game and Decision Lab (IGDL), Beijing, China.
Wei YiIntelligent Game and Decision Lab (IGDL), Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exceptional performance of general-purpose large models has driven various industries to focus on developing domain-specific models. However, large models are not only time-consuming and labor-intensive during the training phase but also have very high hardware requirements during the inference phase, such as large memory and high computational power. These requirements pose considerable challenges for the practical deployment of large models. As these challenges intensify, model compression has become a vital research focus to address these limitations. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the evolution of model compression techniques, from their inception to future directions. To meet the urgent demand for efficient deployment, we delve into several compression methods-such as quantization, pruning, low-rank decomposition, and knowledge distillation-emphasizing their fundamental principles, recent advancements, and innovative strategies. By offering insights into the latest developments and their implications for practical applications, this review serves as a valuable technical resource for researchers and practitioners, providing a range of strategies for model deployment and laying the groundwork for future advancements in model compression.

Indexed as

deep neural networksknowledge distillationlarge language modellow-rank decompositionmodel compressionpruningquantization

Identifiers

PMID40182395
PMCPMC11965593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.