ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
A survey of model compression techniques: past, present, and future.
Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven technological breakthroughs and practical pathways for biodiversity conservation and ecological management.iScience · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Mobile Application for Real-Time Chinese Dish Classification and Nutrient Estimation.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- An Adaptive Compression Method for Lightweight AI Models of Edge Nodes in Customized Production.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GA-AFedOD: gradient-aligned active federated learning for resource-aware object detection in edge industrial IoT.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- ISAAF: an IoT security and attack prevention framework using AI-driven predictive analytics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The exceptional performance of general-purpose large models has driven various industries to focus on developing domain-specific models. However, large models are not only time-consuming and labor-intensive during the training phase but also have very high hardware requirements during the inference phase, such as large memory and high computational power. These requirements pose considerable challenges for the practical deployment of large models. As these challenges intensify, model compression has become a vital research focus to address these limitations. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the evolution of model compression techniques, from their inception to future directions. To meet the urgent demand for efficient deployment, we delve into several compression methods-such as quantization, pruning, low-rank decomposition, and knowledge distillation-emphasizing their fundamental principles, recent advancements, and innovative strategies. By offering insights into the latest developments and their implications for practical applications, this review serves as a valuable technical resource for researchers and practitioners, providing a range of strategies for model deployment and laying the groundwork for future advancements in model compression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.