Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182301›Full record

ReviewPlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

The Utility of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Breast Surgery: A Practical Review.

Layne Raborn Macdonald, Hassan ElHawary, Girish P Joshi, Jeffrey E Janis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Layne Raborn MacdonaldFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
Hassan ElHawaryDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Girish P JoshiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Jeffrey E JanisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In plastic surgery, breast surgery patients are among the most susceptible to postoperative pain. Amidst the opioid epidemic, healthcare goals seek to optimize nonopioid multimodal pain control by including regional analgesia. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is among several regional blocks used in breast surgery. Although the paravertebral block has previously served as the gold standard, new research focused on ESPB may shift standards. Methods: A comprehensive PubMed review was performed in September 2023 to identify articles related to ESPB use in breast surgery. Non-English and unavailable articles were excluded. Data extracted included publication year, techniques, and outcomes. Results: Sixty-eight publications were included, of which 31 were randomized control trials (45.6%). Most were published between 2021 and 2023 (n = 40, 58.8%). Most articles that evaluated pain and opioid use suggested that ESPB performed better than nonblocked groups (n = 26, 38.2% of total articles and n = 4, 5.88% of total articles) and performed similarly to other blocks. However, articles that evaluated the pectoral nerve block suggested it outperformed ESPB in these aspects (n = 6 articles, 8.82%). ESPB was shown to be a safe and procedurally short block to perform, effective in the hands of novice providers. Conclusions: ESPB offers reliable outcomes, improving pain control and decreasing opioid consumption. In turn, this can decrease healthcare costs and patient morbidity.

Identifiers

PMID40182301
PMCPMC11964388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.