ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
The Uroplastic Approach to Complex Rectourethral Fistula Repair: Indications, Technique, Results.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rectourethral fistulae are complex pathologies with significant morbidity that warrant multidisciplinary care. Although gracilis muscle interposition for fistula repair has been reported, specific indications and techniques for this mode of reconstruction remain unclear. Methods: A retrospective quasi-experimental study was previously conducted to assess outcomes of rectourethral fistula management before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary treatment algorithm. Patients with complex rectourethral fistulae and repair with gracilis muscle flap interposition were further investigated. Plastic surgery involvement for gracilis muscle interposition was indicated for (1) radiated rectourethral fistulae less than 3 cm and (2) nonradiated rectourethral fistulae more than 2 cm. Our preferred technique for gracilis muscle flap harvest, transposition, and inset is described in detail. Primary outcomes included healing of rectourethral fistulae and secondary reversal of urinary or fecal diversions. Results: Twenty-three patients with complex rectourethral fistulae underwent gracilis muscle flap interposition between 2001 and 2022 before (n = 12) and after (n = 11) algorithmic implementation. The frequency of definitive rectourethral fistula healing improved in the postalgorithm group by 33%. There was no significant difference in fistula healing time or the rate of urinary or fecal diversions after algorithm implementation. The technique of gracilis muscle flap interposition is also described. Conclusions: The gracilis muscle interposition flap is a valuable reconstructive option for complex rectourethral fistula repair. Implementation of a multidisciplinary treatment algorithm including plastic surgery involvement and refinement of the operative approach was associated with improved frequency of definitive healing of rectourethral fistulae.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.