ArticleJSES international2025
Short-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with navigation system in the Asian population: a retrospective comparative study.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of intraoperative navigation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and its impact on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
- Glenoid component implantation accuracy using a novel handheld computer targeting system in total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.JSES international · 2026Article
- Baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: influence of intraoperative guidance on postoperative outcomes.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In reverse total arthroplasty (rTSA), glenoid component positioning is a critical factor for outcomes especially in Asian populations with smaller glenoids. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of rTSA with and without the navigation system with a minimum follow-up of 2 years in the Asian population. Methods: This was a retrospective comparative study of 33 rTSAs with the navigation system (NAV group) and 40 conventional rTSAs (CON group). Radiologic measurements regarding the position of the glenoid component, glenoid vault perforation by the central cage, and scapular notching, as well as clinical outcomes including range of motion, functional scores, and complications were compared. Number, length, and angulation of screws were assessed. Results: The mean age was 73.9 ± 5.9 years with a mean follow-up of 30.1 ± 6.4 months. The NAV group more frequently utilized augmented baseplate ( Conclusion: In the short-term follow-up, the use of a navigation system in rTSA showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes and complications compared to conventional implantation. However, it enabled a lower superior inclination and a reduced glenoid vault perforation by the central cage, simultaneously allowing for the insertion of longer peripheral screws in a safer direction compared to conventional implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.