ArticleJSES international2025
Predictive factors of intraoperative conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nationwide trends and variations in reverse shoulder arthroplasty in Japan: national database analysis 2014-2023.JSES international · 2026Article
- Early complications and risk factors following reverse versus anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a nationwide registry study.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many factors play a role in decision making for arthroplasty type in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate preoperative and intraoperative factors that might predict the need for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) vs. anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) for patients with primary GHOA. Secondarily, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) were compared. Methods: Patients with primary GHOA indicated for aTSA vs. rTSA were identified. Preoperative records were reviewed for demographics, range of motion, rotator cuff strength, and glenoid morphology. Operative reports were assessed to identify intraoperatively rotator cuff pathology and glenoid deficiency. ASES scores at 2 years postoperative were collected. Results: One hundred eleven patients were included from 2018 to 2021. Ninety-four patients underwent aTSA, while 17 were intraoperatively converted to rTSA. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, or preoperative Walch classification between cohorts. rTSA patients had significantly decreased preoperative external rotation ( Conclusion: Many patients with primary GHOA are well-served with aTSA. However, there are patients with primary GHOA in which rTSA may be ideal given rotator cuff deficiency or glenoid defects felt to limit aTSA glenoid component placement. This study highlights the need for preoperative external rotation and intraoperative evaluation of rotator cuff integrity and glenoid bone stock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.