Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182275›Full record

ArticleJSES international2025

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Argentine version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with shoulder disorders.

Juan C Porollan, Santiago Soliño, Franco J Fabani, María G de Ilzarbe, Micaela Oyola, Tomás A Bossio, Julián M Morales, Joaquín López, Federico J Villalba, Gastón Muhafara and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Juan C PorollanPhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Santiago SoliñoPhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Franco J FabaniPhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María G de IlzarbePhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Micaela OyolaPhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Tomás A BossioPhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Julián M MoralesPhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Joaquín LópezPhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Federico J VillalbaKINÉ - Kinesiología Deportiva y Funcional, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gastón MuhafaraHospital General de Agudos P. Piñero, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo O PolicastroPhysical Therapy Unit, Hospital General de Agudos C. G. Durand, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shoulder disorders are some of the leading causes of musculoskeletal conditions with a significant economic impact worldwide. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) questionnaire has proved to be a valid and useful tool for the assessment of disability; however, reporting of properties in several languages has been inconsistent, and the quality of the studies available is low. Moreover, there is only one version in Spanish, designed in Spain, which does not consider the linguistic differences existing in Argentina. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to conduct the cross-cultural adaptation of the SPADI and assess its reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability in subjects with shoulder disorders. Materials and methods: The study was conducted following the COSMIN Guidelines (COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of health Measurement INstruments). We included Argentine residents, older than 18 years of age, referred to physiotherapy for shoulder disorders. Results: A total of 101 patients were evaluated. Reliability was acceptable with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change were 2.18 and 6.05, respectively. Construct validity was excellent, and responsiveness was high. Also, the minimal clinically important difference was 18.46 points, the substantial clinical benefit was 27.69 points, and the symptom acceptable level value was 21.35 points. Conclusion: A cross-cultural adaptation of the Argentine version of the SPADI was conducted. This version proved to be valid, reliable, and responsive with interpretability values.

Indexed as

ClinimetricsDisabilityMinimal clinically important differencePatient-reported outcomesPsychometricsShoulder painSPADIValidation study

Identifiers

PMID40182275
PMCPMC11962614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.