ArticleJSES international2025
Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction with acellular human dermal allograft for irreparable rotator cuff tears: outcomes, complications, and reoperations at 2-year minimum follow-up.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rotator Cuff Reconstruction Using Biceps Tendon Autograft Versus Acellular Dermal Allograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Management of posterosuperior irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) remains challenging without clear consensus among shoulder surgeons. Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with dermal allograft has been proposed as a promising treatment option. However, current investigations are limited to short term studies and recent data has suggested variable clinical outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to report intermediate-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent arthroscopic SCR with a dermal allograft for IRCTs. Methods: Over a 4-year period (2016-2020), all patients who underwent an arthroscopic dermal allograft SCR with a minimum 2-year follow-up period were identified. SCR with dermal allograft was performed for patients with an IRCT utilizing a 3-mm acellular dermal allograft. Collected clinical outcomes included range of motion, strength, Numeric Rating Scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, Single-Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, complications, and reoperations. Results: The final cohort included 41 dermal allograft SCR performed in 40 patients (1 bilateral) with a majority male cohort (n = 29; 72%), a mean age of 67 ± 7 years, body mass index of 28.4 ± 5.0, and follow-up of 5.3 ± 1.4 years. Clinically, there was a significant improvement in preoperative and postoperative Numeric Rating Scale pain scores from 5.0 to 1.8 ( Conclusion: At a cohort mean of 5 years after arthroscopic SCR with dermal allograft for IRCTs, patients experienced sustained pain relief but no significant improvement in shoulder function. Additionally, 20% sustained a postoperative complication with a 14% reoperation rate. These findings should be considered when counseling patients about the challenges of managing IRCTs and the possible outcomes of utilizing dermal allograft SCR as a surgical modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.